On October 2, 2002, an auction house in London put up a photo for sale that would cause a stir among the British tabloids. The black-and-white photo showed a young woman reclining in a bathtub, her arms behind her head, a Mona Lisa smile on her face. The woman was identified as Princess Margaret, the sister of Queen Elizabeth II.

The photo was taken in the early 1950s, when Princess Margaret was in her early twenties. It was taken by a friend of the Princess, who had asked her to pose for a photo in his bathroom. Princess Margaret agreed, and when she saw the resulting photo, she liked it so much that she had several copies made.

The photo became controversial when it was put up for auction in 2002. Some people argued that the photo was a private moment that should not be made public, while others argued that the photo was a work of art that should be preserved.

In the end, the photo was sold to a private collector for £10,000.

Did Princess Margaret take a picture in a bathtub?

Rumors have circulated for years that Princess Margaret took a picture in a bathtub, and while the veracity of these rumors has never been confirmed, they continue to circulate online.

Princess Margaret, the younger sister of Queen Elizabeth II, was known for her wild lifestyle and her many affairs. In fact, she was even nicknamed “The Wicked Witch of the West” due to her reputation for being difficult to work with.

One of the most famous rumors about Princess Margaret is that she took a picture in a bathtub. The story goes that she was taking a bath and someone snapped a picture of her, and that picture has since been circulated online.

However, there is no evidence that this picture actually exists, and it’s likely that the rumor is just a hoax. In fact, there is no evidence that Princess Margaret even took a picture in a bathtub.

See also  Wyze Wireless Outdoor Camera

Nevertheless, the rumor continues to circulate online, and it’s likely that it will continue to do so for years to come.

Did Princess Margaret scald herself in the bath?

On November 2, 1963, Princess Margaret, the sister of Queen Elizabeth II, scalded herself in the bathtub at her home in Kensington Palace. The accident occurred when she was reaching for a towel and her foot slipped, causing her to fall and splash boiling water onto her leg. The wound required surgery and left a large scar.

Despite the injury, Margaret continued to lead a active life. She traveled to the United States in 1964 to promote the British tourist industry, and later that year she went on a goodwill tour of India. In 1965, she visited Brazil to attend the funeral of President João Goulart.

In 1971, Margaret’s marriage to Antony Armstrong-Jones, 1st Earl of Snowdon, ended in divorce. She later remarried, to Robin Douglas-Home, and had two children. Margaret died in 2002 at the age of 71.

Is the photo of Princess Margaret real?

Is the photo of Princess Margaret real?

This is a question that has been asked many times over the years, and the answer is still not entirely clear. The photo in question is a black and white image that appears to show a young Princess Margaret with an older man. It is believed to have been taken in the late 1930s, and some people claim that it is a real photograph of the Princess, while others believe that it is a fake.

So, is the photo of Princess Margaret real or not? There is no definitive answer to this question, as there is no definitive proof either way. However, there is evidence to suggest that the photo may not be authentic. For example, some experts have pointed out that the man in the photo does not appear to be the same man who was pictured with Princess Margaret in other photos from the same time period. In addition, the photo is not dated, and there is no information about where or when it was taken.

Despite all of this evidence, some people still believe that the photo is genuine. There is no definitive way to prove whether or not it is real, so it remains a mystery.

See also  Wired Outdoor Security Camera

Where is the Poltimore tiara today?

The Poltimore tiara is one of the most beautiful pieces of jewelry in the world. Designed by the House of Garrard, it is a tiara made of diamonds, rubies, and sapphires. The tiara was made for the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II in 1953.

The Poltimore tiara was originally owned by the Earl and Countess of Plymouth. It was passed down to their daughter, Lady Katherine, who wore it at the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II. Lady Katherine then gave the tiara to her daughter, Amanda, who wore it at her wedding.

The Poltimore tiara is now owned by Amanda’s son, Viscount Poltimore. He has loaned it to the Victoria and Albert Museum in London for a special exhibit on royal tiaras.

Is the picture of Margaret from The Crown real?

The Crown, a Netflix series about the reign of Queen Elizabeth II, has been met with critical acclaim. One of the most riveting aspects of the show is the depiction of the royal family, including Princess Margaret, the Queen’s younger sister.

While the show is based on a combination of historical fact and creative license, many viewers have been wondering: is the picture of Margaret from The Crown real?

The answer is yes. The picture of Margaret used in the show is actually a picture of her taken in the early 1950s. Margaret was a complex and interesting woman, and the show does a great job of capturing her personality.

Margaret was born in 1930, and was the younger sister of Queen Elizabeth II. She was a rebellious and carefree child, and was often in trouble for her wild antics.

As she grew older, Margaret became more interested in politics and fashion. She was a fierce advocate for women’s rights, and was one of the first royals to wear pants in public.

She was also a trendsetter when it came to fashion, and was often photographed wearing stylish and daring outfits.

Margaret was married twice. Her first marriage, to Antony Armstrong-Jones, was controversial due to his rumored affairs. Her second marriage, to photographer Roddy Llewellyn, was much more private and low-key.

See also  Gender Swap Photo Editor Online

Margaret died in 2002 at the age of 71. She was a complex and fascinating woman, and the picture of her from The Crown is a great representation of her personality.

What Crown did Princess Margaret wear on her wedding?

What Crown did Princess Margaret wear on her wedding?

When Princess Margaret married Anthony Armstrong-Jones on May 6, 1960, she wore a specially commissioned crown designed by the British jeweller Philip Antrobus. The crown was made of gold, platinum, and diamonds, and featured a unique navette shape. It was reported that the crown cost £10,000 to make (approximately £170,000 in today’s currency).

After her wedding, Princess Margaret rarely wore her crown again. It was last seen publicly in 2002, when it was displayed as part of an exhibition of royal jewellery at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London.

Do Royals bathe themselves?

Do Royals bathe themselves?

This is a question that has been asked for centuries, and the answer is still not entirely clear. Some believe that Royals do not bathe themselves, and that they have servants who take care of all their bathing needs. Others believe that Royals do bathe themselves, but they do so in a very specific and unusual way.

There are a few pieces of evidence that support the idea that Royals do not bathe themselves. For example, many Royals have been known to wear the same clothes for days or weeks at a time. This could be because they don’t have time to bathe, or because they don’t need to bathe because they have servants who take care of it for them.

There are also a few pieces of evidence that support the idea that Royals do bathe themselves, but in a very specific way. For example, Royals are often seen taking baths in very large, ornate tubs. This could be because they want to show off their wealth and status, or it could be because they have a special way of bathing that requires a lot of space.

So, the answer to the question “Do Royals bathe themselves?” is still not entirely clear. However, the evidence seems to suggest that they do, but they do it in a way that is different from the way most people bathe themselves.